Let
be a discrete random variable taking a finite number of possible values
with probabilities
respectively such that
.
We attempt to arrive at a number that will measure the amount of uncertainty.
Let
be a function defined on the interval
and
be interpreted as the uncertainty associated with the event
,
or the information conveyed by revealing that
has taken on the value
in a given performance of the experiment. For each n, we shall define
a function
of the n variables
.
The function
is to be interpreted as the average uncertainty associated with the event
given by
![]() |
(1.1) |
Thus
is the average uncertainty removed by revealing the value of
.
For simplicity we shall denote
![]() |
(1.2) |
for all
and
.
Replacing
by
we get
![]() |
(1.3) |
Based on (1.2) and (1.3) we present the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1. Let
be a function satisfying (1.2) and (1.3), where
is real valued continuous function defined over [0,1]. Then
is given by
![]() |
(1.4) |
where
with
.
The proof is based on the following Lemma (ref. Chaundy and McLeod, 1961 [27]).
Lemma 1.1. Let
be a continuous function satisfying
![]() |
(1.5) |
for all
Then
![]() |
(1.6) |
for all
with
.
Alternatively the measure (1.4) can be characterized as follows (ref. Shannon,1948 [86]; Feinstein, 1958 [36]).
Theorem 1.2. Let
be a function satisfying the following axioms:
A third way to characterize the measure (1.4) is as follows (ref. Aczél and Daróczy, 1975 [2]).
Theorem 1.3. Let
be a function satisfying the following axioms:
The following is a different way to characterize the measure (1.4). It is based on the functional equation famous as fundamental equation of information.
Theorem 1.4. Let
be a function satisfying
For simplicity, let us take
in (1.4). If we put the restriction
in the above theorems with
,
we get
.
This yields
![]() |
(1.7) |
For more characterizations of the measure (1.4) or (1.7) refer to Aczél
and Daróczy (1975) [2] and Mathai
and Rathie (1975) [71].